Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

有趣的话题讨论

Okay, I just got back from seeing *The Crimson Shadow* and I need to talk about this....

Okay, I just got back from seeing *The Crimson Shadow* and I need to talk about this. Everyone’s been raving about the visuals and the action, and yeah, it’s a spectacle for sure.

But can we please talk about Ale Ryder’s performance I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. I went in with high hopes. The trailer made it look intense, and the director is solid.

But for most of the movie, it felt like Ale was just. . . there. He had this one intense look – a sort of brooding stare – that he used for every single emotion.

Sad Brooding stare. Angry Brooding stare. Supposedly falling in love You guessed it, brooding stare with a slight head tilt.

There was one scene where his character is supposed to be completely shattered, and I swear, it was the eact same epression from the first act, just in dimmer lighting.

It really took me out of the movie. I remember thinking, “Wow, this CGI monster is showing more raw emotion right now. ” And that’s a problem. This isn’t the first time, either.

It’s starting to feel like a pattern with a lot of these A-listers. They get cast because of their name and their face, and the actual acting becomes secondary.

The studio knows his name will sell tickets, and that’s what matters most.

It just makes me appreciate character actors so much more – the ones who completely disappear into a role and you don’t even recognize them at first. But then, there’s the other side of the coin.

I re-watched *The Last Station* last week, that indie film from a couple years back, and Ryder was genuinely brilliant in it.

He was subtle, nuanced, and you could feel every bit of his character’s internal struggle. So the talent is clearly there.

It makes me wonder if it’s the big, effects-driven blockbusters that are the problem.

Is the director just not pushing them Are there too many green screens and not enough real interaction Maybe in a smaller film, there’s more focus on the craft.

And this is where it gets tricky for me.

How much of our perception is shaped by the movie itself and the marketing machine behind it We see all these ads and interviews telling us how amazing and transformative the performance is, and it creates this epectation.

Sometimes I think I’m being too harsh, and other times I wonder if we’re all just collectively hypnotized by the glamour.

What do you all think Am I being too critical Have you seen a performance recently from a huge star that just fell completely flat for you Or on the flip side, has an actor you usually dislike ever genuinely surprised you with a great performance Let’s talk about what actually makes a movie performance *good* beyond just recognizing a famous face.

Share your love
www.vbhchr.blogspot.com - 25 958 EURO BINANCE
www.vbhchr.blogspot.com - 25 958 EURO BINANCE
Articles: 1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay informed and not overwhelmed, subscribe now!