Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

The Haunting Legacy of Unit 731 in Modern Cinema and Television

It’s one of those dark chapters of history that you almost wish wasn’t true....

It’s one of those dark chapters of history that you almost wish wasn’t true. But it is, and every so often, a movie or a documentary comes along that drags it all back into the light. I’m talking about Unit 731, the Imperial Japanese Army’s covert biological and chemical warfare research unit during World War II. It’s not an easy topic for filmmakers to tackle. How do you portray such unimaginable cruelty without exploiting the victims or turning it into simple horror? It’s a tightrope walk, and the few projects that have tried are fascinating, not just for what they show, but for the discussions they force us to have.

I first learned about Unit 731 not in a history class, but from a late-night movie on some obscure channel. The film was the 1988 Chinese documentary-drama *Men Behind the Sun*. I was probably too young to be watching it, and the images stuck with me for weeks. It wasn’t just the gore, though there was plenty of that. It was the cold, clinical atmosphere the film managed to create. It felt less like a traditional war movie and more like a descent into a moral abyss. The film used a lot of its budget to recreate the experiments, and while some critics called it sensationalist, its power came from its unflinching commitment to showing the mechanics of the horror. You see scientists in lab coats, not screaming soldiers, and that’s somehow far more terrifying. It made the whole thing feel real in a way a textbook never could.

The story of Unit 731 is, at its core, a story about the corruption of science and medicine. Located primarily in Pingfang, Harbin, in occupied Manchuria, it was headed by Lieutenant General Shirō Ishii. The unit’s mission was to develop biological weapons, and to do that, they conducted experiments on living human subjects. We’re talking about men, women, children, and infants. They were referred to as “maruta,” or logs, to dehumanize them. The experiments are the stuff of nightmares: vivisections without anesthesia, frostbite testing, weapon testing, and deliberate infection with diseases like plague and cholera. It’s estimated that over 3,000 people, mostly Chinese and Korean, died within the walls of Unit 731, and some estimates are far higher when you account for their field testing.

Now, bringing this to the screen is a monumental challenge. The 2001 Russian film *Philosophy of a Knife* is a four-hour-long experimental documentary that tries to do just that. I remember trying to watch it in one sitting and having to take multiple breaks. It’s a grueling experience. It mixes historical footage, interviews, and brutally graphic reenactments. The film is controversial; some say it’s an important historical record, while others argue it’s just trauma porn. For me, it highlighted the fundamental problem with this subject matter. How much is too much? If you sanitize it, you betray the victims. If you show everything, you risk numbing the audience or, worse, entertaining the morbidly curious. It’s a dilemma that every filmmaker who approaches this topic has to face.

What’s perhaps even more disturbing, and a theme that some films touch upon, is the aftermath. After Japan surrendered, the United States granted immunity to Shirō Ishii and many of his top scientists in exchange for their research data. This was part of a secret deal known as Operation Paperclip. The U.S. was terrified that the Soviet Union would get this knowledge first. So, the very people who committed these atrocities never faced justice. They went on to have careers in academia, medicine, and politics in Japan. This moral compromise is a central theme in the 2015 South Korean film *The Long Way Home*. While not solely about Unit 731, it features a subplot where a Japanese army doctor, haunted by what he did in a unit similar to 731, tries to atone. The film does a great job of showing the lingering psychological scars on the perpetrators, a perspective you don’t often see.

Television has approached the topic more cautiously, often weaving it into larger narratives. I remember watching an episode of *The X-Files* called “731” which, while fictional, directly referenced the unit and the American cover-up. It was my first time seeing the concept pop up in mainstream Western media. More recently, the Chinese television series *The Storm* and other wartime dramas have featured story arcs involving the unit. They tend to focus on the heroic efforts of Chinese resistance fighters trying to expose or sabotage its work. These shows are hugely popular in China and serve as a constant, visceral reminder of the war for younger generations. For them, it’s not ancient history; it’s a foundational part of their national narrative of resilience.

The lack of a big-budget, mainstream Hollywood film about Unit 731 is itself telling. I’ve often wondered why that is. Is the subject too politically sensitive? Too graphically horrifying? Or is it simply that the American complicity in the cover-up makes it an uncomfortable story to tell? It’s probably a mix of all three. When you watch a movie like *Schindler’s List*, as devastating as it is, there’s a clear moral framework and a hero to latch onto. The story of Unit 731 offers no such comfort. The “good guys” in the end made a deal with the devil. It’s a messier, more complicated, and ultimately more challenging story about the grey areas of geopolitics and the price of “winning” a war.

For me, the most impactful portrayal wasn’t in a film, but in a museum. I visited the Unit 731 Museum in Harbin a few years ago. Walking through the preserved ruins of the facility, seeing the rusted surgical tools and the reconstructed prison cells, it all became terrifyingly tangible. No movie could ever fully capture that feeling. But the films and shows that try are incredibly important. They keep the memory alive. They force us to remember that this wasn’t a supernatural horror story; it was a man-made one, carried out by educated people in white coats. And that, perhaps, is the most frightening lesson of all.

Împărtășește-ți dragostea

4 comentarii

  1. 说实话,看到这篇文章的时候我正端着咖啡,结果读到一半就喝不下去了。作者说这是”你宁愿它不是真实存在的黑暗历史”,我完全懂这种感觉。每次看到关于731部队的影视作品,那种不适感会缠绕我好几天。

    我第一次知道731部队是在大学,不是因为课本,而是某个深夜在论坛里偶然点开了一个帖子。那种冲击力至今难忘——原来人类可以对同类做出这种事。作者提到1988年那部《黑太阳731》,我后来特意找来看过。最让我难受的不是那些直观的残忍画面,而是影片里那些医生穿着白大褂做记录的样子,他们把活生生的人当成实验材料的那种冷静,比任何恐怖片都让人毛骨悚然。

    作者说得特别对,这确实是个创作上的难题。去年看了《刀的哲学》,影片用非常隐晦的手法处理那些实验场景,镜头总是停留在医生的表情或者实验室的器具上。这种克制反而让观众更痛苦,因为你的想象力会填补那些空白。相比之下,有些B级片直接把这段历史拍成血浆片,我觉得那是对受害者的二次伤害。

    不过我在想,完全回避血腥就够了吗?前阵子看《恶魔的饱食》改编的舞台剧,他们用舞蹈和影子来表现人体实验,有个场景是投影仪把档案资料投射在演员身上。这种抽象的表现手法确实很艺术,但会不会让年轻人低估了这段历史的残酷程度?我侄女看完后居然问我”那些实验是不是就像我们生物课做实验差不多”,我当时真的愣住了。

    说到教育,作者提到不是在历史课上学到731部队,这点我特别有共鸣。我们的历史教育对这段总是轻描淡写,反而让影视作品承担了传播真相的责任。但问题在于,电影为了戏剧效果难免会改编,这就造成了很多认知偏差。比如很多人以为731部队只有日本医生,其实当时还有不少协作者,这个层面很少被展现。

    我觉得最值得讨论的是,这类影片到底应该追求什么?是还原历史真相?还是警示后人?看《南京!南京!》的时候,那个日本医生在废墟里捡起孩子的玩具那个镜头,虽然知道是虚构的,但确实引发了我对人性复杂性的思考。好的战争片不应该只是简单地把人分成善恶两面。

    说到这个,最近奈飞上有部纪录片用了很多动画来再现幸存者证词,把最残酷的部分用阴影和留白来处理。这种手法我觉得挺聪明的,既传达了痛苦,又不会让观众因为画面太过刺激而回避观看。特别是现在年轻人获取信息的方式越来越碎片化,可能需要这种更精巧的呈现方式。

    但有时候我在想,我们这些隔着屏幕讨论的人,真的有资格对表现手法指手画脚吗?那些真正经历过的人,看到这些影视作品会是什么感受?记得有次在电影节看到一位南京大屠杀幸存者说,她从来不看任何相关电影,”因为再好的演员也演不出那种绝望”。这句话我一直记着。

    作者说这些作品”强迫我们进行讨论”,这确实是最重要的。上周我和00后的表弟看《金陵十三钗》,他看完后第一次主动问我关于抗战历史的问题。虽然电影有很多艺术加工,但能激发年轻人去了解真相,这个意义可能比影片本身更重要。

    不过我还是希望未来能看到更多亚洲电影人合作的作品,毕竟这段历史影响着整个东亚。单一国家的视角总是有限的,如果能像《鬼乡》那样跨国合作,或许能呈现更立体的历史图景。毕竟,记住这段历史不是为了延续仇恨,而是为了不让类似的事再次发生。

    最后想说,看完这篇文章让我想起《寻梦环游记》里的那句话:真正的死亡是被遗忘。或许这些电影存在的最大意义,就是不让那些名字被遗忘在历史的长河里。虽然这个过程很痛苦,但我们有责任记住。

  2. 说真的,这篇文章完全说出了我那种矛盾的心情。我也是通过一部电影才知道731部队这件事的,记得是前几年看的一部纪录片,看完之后整个人都不好了。那种感觉特别奇怪,你既希望更多人知道这段历史,又担心拍出来的东西会变成纯粹的感官刺激。

    作者提到那个平衡的问题真的很关键。怎么把这种题材拍得既有力量又不廉价?我注意到最近有些剧集确实在尝试不同的方式。有的是通过幸存者后代的视角来讲,有的是把重点放在战后责任追究上。但说实话,很少有作品能真正处理好这个度。要么太轻描淡写,要么就过分渲染那些实验细节,看着特别难受。

    说到这个,我觉得最让我纠结的是,这类作品到底该不该在国际上传播?就像文章里说的,有些制作会选择更隐晦的表达方式,可能是担心海外观众接受不了。但这样一来,历史的真实性会不会打折扣?我上次看的那部日本导演拍的片子就处理得很含蓄,虽然艺术性很强,但总觉得少了点什么。

    不过话说回来,能引发讨论总是好的。就像我看了那部纪录片后,特意去查了很多资料,还和几个朋友争论过该不该让孩子看这类内容。有个朋友说得挺对:这些电影最大的价值,可能就是逼着我们去面对那些不愿意面对的事实。虽然过程很痛苦,但总比遗忘要来得好。

    现在偶尔在视频网站看到相关推荐,我还是会点进去看。每次看完心情都很沉重,但确实像作者说的,这些作品在强迫我们思考。而且我发现,最近几年的处理方式好像越来越成熟了,开始更多关注历史记忆和警示意义,而不是单纯展示残酷。这算是个好趋势吧。

  3. 说真的,看完这篇文章特别有共鸣。我到现在都记得第一次看《小丑》时那种胸口发闷的感觉,电影散场后整个人懵了很久,连爆米花都没吃完。当时我和室友走回宿舍的路上一直在争论——他觉得亚瑟·弗莱克纯粹是反社会,我却觉得那个角色更像被社会逼到墙角的普通人。这种能让人吵到半夜的电影,现在真的不多了。

    不过听说续集要拍成歌舞片,我第一反应是:这能行吗?倒不是怀疑菲尼克斯和Lady Gaga的演技,只是2019版那种压抑的灰色调子,和歌舞片的绚烂画面怎么想都像油和水。但转念一想,《爱乐之城》不也把爵士乐和失意人生揉得恰到好处?可能导演托德·菲利普斯就是想用这种极端反差来表现阿卡姆疯人院里的荒诞感。毕竟“Folie à Deux”这个副标题本身就是指“二联性精神病”,让两个人在癫狂的歌舞中互相腐蚀,想想反而觉得带感。

    现在超级英雄电影确实需要这种冒险。漫威和DC流水线式的片子看多了,连我十二岁的侄子都能预测下一帧会出现什么特效。反倒是《小丑》这种彻底跳出超英框架的作品,去年在威尼斯电影节能拿金狮奖,说明观众早就渴求更复杂的叙事。我表妹昨天还在说,她期待哈莉·奎茵这次不是穿着短裙甩棒球棍,而是真正展现那个被心理医生蛊惑的疯狂爱情。

    唯一担心的是制片方在搞平衡术——既想保留前作的沉重主题,又要塞进商业元素。要是最后变成《芝加哥》和《黑暗骑士》的尴尬混搭,那就太可惜了。不过看到文章里提到停车场讨论的细节,突然觉得能引发真实对话的电影,哪怕有瑕疵也值得期待。等上映那天,我肯定得带着看过首部的朋友一起去,这次估计要在电影院门口的奶茶店吵到打烊。

  4. Yeah, it’s one of those topics that just sits with you after you learn about it. I also first heard about Unit 731 outside of school, through a random documentary, and it’s shocking how little-known it is. It’s such a difficult line for filmmakers to walk – showing the horror of it without being sensational. I think it’s important these stories get told, but you’re right, it has to be done with respect for the victims. It’s not entertainment, it’s history we can’t look away from.

Răspunde-i lui .8IvzcAnulează răspunsul

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *

Stay informed and not overwhelmed, subscribe now!